Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Addressed | 2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Addressed | 2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Addressed | 2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Addressed | 2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 42.69 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 79.3 µg/L | 55/55 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 29.28 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 77.1 µg/L | 55/55 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 55.19 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 92.9 µg/L | 55/55 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 153.6 µg/L 192% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 302 µg/L | 55/55 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 58.05 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 78.6 µg/L | 51/55 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 65.65 µg/L 109% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 86.2 µg/L | 31/55 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 41.725 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 56.3 µg/L | 28/55 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 24.96 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26.8 µg/L | 24/55 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 205 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 250 µg/L | 19/20 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 16.075 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.5 µg/L | 18/55 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0024 mg/L 16% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2025 |
| Lead | 1.96 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 2 µg/L | 9/20 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 5.14 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.5 µg/L | 5/55 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 4/55 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
27 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Multi-County Wsc
Is Multi-County Wsc tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Multi-County Wsc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Multi-County Wsc's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Multi-County Wsc serve?
Multi-County Wsc reports serving 3,631 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Multi-County Wsc had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 227 violations on file for Multi-County Wsc, of which 205 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 4 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.