← Texas

Tap water quality report

Kings Point Wsc

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 109 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

109
contaminants tested
18
detected
174
people served
4
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Comal

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
24
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
Other Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2025-05-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2025-05-01
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
2470 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
334.5 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 380 µg/L
14/17 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0030 mg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
7/7 LCR 2025
Lead
12.03 µg/L 80%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 15 µg/L
7/17 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
2.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.8 µg/L
6/7 SYR4 2015–2019
Dibromochloromethane
3.775 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.1 µg/L
6/7 SYR4 2015–2019
Barium
39.34 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 39.5 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L
3/7 SYR4 2015–2019
Fluoride
338 µg/L 8.5%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 340 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
2324 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2330 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2015
TTHM
5.91 µg/L 7.4%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.1 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Chloroform
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/7 SYR4 2015–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
3.7 pCi/L 74%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2014
Combined Uranium
1.5 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2014
Dibromoacetic Acid
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
3 pCi/L 20%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2014
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
1 µg/L 1.7%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Xylenes, Total
1.7 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
1/5 SYR4 2015–2019
91 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
STEVENSON, RON
Phone
830-935-2794
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Kings Point Wsc

Is Kings Point Wsc tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Kings Point Wsc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Kings Point Wsc's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Lead, Lead, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Kings Point Wsc serve?

Kings Point Wsc reports serving 174 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Kings Point Wsc had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 24 violations on file for Kings Point Wsc, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.