Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 112.06 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 154 µg/L | 53/54 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 195.82 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1026 µg/L | 53/54 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 69.82 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 119 µg/L | 53/54 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 170.74 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 298 µg/L | 53/54 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 504.7 µg/L 631% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 1387 µg/L | 53/54 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 183.45 µg/L 306% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 337 µg/L | 52/54 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 63.6 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 273 µg/L | 51/54 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 74.6 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 102 µg/L | 51/54 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 18.585 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 53 µg/L | 48/54 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 10.25 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 44.3 µg/L | 40/54 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 584.2 µg/L 45% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 692 µg/L | 30/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 22.09 µg/L 147% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 63.4 µg/L | 18/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 6.94 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.7 µg/L | 17/54 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0021 mg/L 14% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 8/8 | LCR | 2023 |
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Coke County Wsc
Is Coke County Wsc tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Coke County Wsc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Coke County Wsc's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Coke County Wsc serve?
Coke County Wsc reports serving 410 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Coke County Wsc had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 745 violations on file for Coke County Wsc, of which 626 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.