← Texas

Tap water quality report

Rra Saied Ws

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 14. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
14
detected
68
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Childress

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
12
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
Other Monitoring Unaddressed 2018-08-17
Other Monitoring Resolved 2018-08-17
Other Monitoring Resolved 2018-08-17
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
567.62 µg/L 44%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1409.6 µg/L
25/25 SYR4 2012–2017
Lead
2.68 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L
12/25 SYR4 2012–2017
Lead
0.0030 mg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
10/10 LCR 2023
Bromodichloromethane
10.66 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.8 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
5.3145 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.2 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
13.685 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.4 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
9.26 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.4 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
9.486 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.2 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
17.405 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.4 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
31.49 µg/L 39%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 32.4 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
34.705 µg/L 58%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 38.1 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
5.68 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.8 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.45 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L
3/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
5.36 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.5 µg/L
3/8 SYR4 2012–2019

Utility contact

Contact
HEANEY, FABIAN, A
Phone
940-723-8697
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Rra Saied Ws

Is Rra Saied Ws tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Rra Saied Ws's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Rra Saied Ws's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Rra Saied Ws serve?

Rra Saied Ws reports serving 68 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Rra Saied Ws had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 12 violations on file for Rra Saied Ws, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.