← Texas

Tap water quality report

City of Port Lavaca

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 44 contaminants and detected 22. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

44
contaminants tested
22
detected
12,000
people served
138
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Calhoun

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

138
health-based violations
204
violations on file
5
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Unaddressed 2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30
MCL Health-based Unaddressed 2026-04-01 → 2026-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0142 µg/L 4/4 2024
Pfhxa 0.0100 µg/L 4/4 2024
Pfpea 0.0163 µg/L 4/4 2024
PFHXS 0.0072 µg/L 3/4 2024
PFBS 0.0065 µg/L 2/4 2024
PFOA 0.0060 µg/L 2/4 2024
PFOS 0.0047 µg/L 1/4 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
40.385 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 44.6 µg/L
124/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
60.04 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 75.2 µg/L
124/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
36.94 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 43.6 µg/L
124/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
35.91 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 42.2 µg/L
124/124 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
110.85 µg/L 139%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 136 µg/L
124/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
58.84 µg/L 98%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 78.1 µg/L
124/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
21.86 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32.5 µg/L
124/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
9.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.2 µg/L
121/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
11.56 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.4 µg/L
117/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
675 µg/L 52%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 3880 µg/L
91/91 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
4.41 µg/L 29%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 21.6 µg/L
51/91 SYR4 2013–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
8.655 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10 µg/L
24/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0023 mg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
16/16 LCR 2024
Monochloroacetic Acid
6.05 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7 µg/L
6/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
14.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
3/4 UCMR-5 2024
22 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaHfpo-DaNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfuna

Utility contact

Contact
WHITLOW, JACK
Phone
361-552-9793

Frequently asked questions about City of Port Lavaca

Is City of Port Lavaca tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in City of Port Lavaca's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in City of Port Lavaca's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does City of Port Lavaca serve?

City of Port Lavaca reports serving 12,000 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has City of Port Lavaca had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 204 violations on file for City of Port Lavaca, of which 138 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 5 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.