Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2004-03-01 → 2004-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2004-03-01 → 2004-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2004-03-01 → 2004-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2004-03-01 → 2004-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2004-03-01 → 2004-03-31 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2025-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2024-07-02 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2007-01-01 → 2007-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2007-01-01 → 2007-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2007-01-01 → 2007-03-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 26.495 µg/L 2% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 37.8 µg/L | 20/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 12.35 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.9 µg/L | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 4.83 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.6 µg/L | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 3.7805 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.18 µg/L | 10/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.37 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 18.19 µg/L 23% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 18.7 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 2.37 µg/L 4% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate | 20 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 6/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 1227 µg/L 31% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1230 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Barium | 110.425 µg/L 5.5% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 111 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2015–2018 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 2/2 | LCR | 2025 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 1.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/12 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1 pCi/L 20% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2014 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 20 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lithium | 26 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/1 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
94 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Southwood Estates
Is Southwood Estates tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Southwood Estates's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Southwood Estates's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, Lead, Dibromoacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Southwood Estates serve?
Southwood Estates reports serving 1,347 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Southwood Estates had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 63 violations on file for Southwood Estates, of which 5 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.