Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-09-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-09-01 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-08-01 → 2019-08-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-08-01 → 2019-08-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-08-01 → 2019-08-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-08-01 → 2019-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-10-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 623.25 µg/L 48% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 711 µg/L | 36/36 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 4.9775 µg/L 33% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.03 µg/L | 24/36 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 20 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 12/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 10.17 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.8 µg/L | 7/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 6.84 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.9 µg/L | 7/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 3.325 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L | 6/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 128.6 µg/L 6.4% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 129 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.73 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.8 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Fluoride | 774 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 780 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| TTHM | 15.79 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 15.8 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 9.03 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.8 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 1.395 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L | 2/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0114 mg/L 76% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 2/2 | LCR | 2025 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 19.5 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 20 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.5 pCi/L 30% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2016 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
63 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Meadowland Subdivision
Is Meadowland Subdivision tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Meadowland Subdivision's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Meadowland Subdivision's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Nitrate, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Meadowland Subdivision serve?
Meadowland Subdivision reports serving 510 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Meadowland Subdivision had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 14 violations on file for Meadowland Subdivision, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.