Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-06-01 → 2013-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-06-01 → 2013-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-06-01 → 2013-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-06-01 → 2013-06-30 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-02 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-02 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-07-01 → 2023-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-07-01 → 2023-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-07-01 → 2023-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-07-01 → 2023-09-30 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| PFBS | 0.0031 µg/L | 1/4 | 2024 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 206.4 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 303 µg/L | 153/154 | SYR4 | 2013–2018 |
| Lead | 3.446 µg/L 23% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 32.1 µg/L | 128/154 | SYR4 | 2013–2018 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 4.575 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.8 µg/L | 106/130 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 3.6 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.3 µg/L | 101/130 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 2.88 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.5 µg/L | 73/130 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 9.865 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 17.5 µg/L | 64/67 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.81 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.6 µg/L | 50/67 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 1.81 µg/L 3% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.8 µg/L | 50/67 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 2581.5 µg/L 26% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2620 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0010 mg/L 6.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 16/16 | LCR | 2024 |
| Chloroform | 5.85 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.2 µg/L | 15/130 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 2546.5 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2550 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Xylenes, Total | 35.025 µg/L 0.4% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 46 µg/L | 6/63 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 42.58 µg/L 2.1% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 42.8 µg/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Fluoride | 210 µg/L 5.3% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Dichloromethane | 1.085 µg/L 22% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L | 2/63 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.5 pCi/L 30% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2016 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 1.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/67 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Ethylbenzene | 7.5 µg/L 1.1% of the EPA limit 700 µg/L | 1/63 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Toluene | 2.3 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 1/63 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
88 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about City of Leon Valley
Is City of Leon Valley tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in City of Leon Valley's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in City of Leon Valley's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Dibromochloromethane, Bromoform, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does City of Leon Valley serve?
City of Leon Valley reports serving 7,794 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has City of Leon Valley had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 286 violations on file for City of Leon Valley, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.