Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1999-04-01 → 1999-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1999-01-01 → 1999-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1998-10-01 → 1998-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1998-07-01 → 1998-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1998-07-01 → 1998-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1997-10-01 → 1997-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1997-10-01 → 1997-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1994-08-12 → 1997-08-11 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2025-07-02 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-01 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pfba | 0.0084 µg/L | 3/3 | 2024 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 511.5 µg/L 39% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 808 µg/L | 120/122 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 22.095 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26.3 µg/L | 108/108 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 30.975 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 33.8 µg/L | 108/108 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 16.365 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20.3 µg/L | 108/108 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 15.895 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18 µg/L | 102/102 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 62.905 µg/L 79% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 69.4 µg/L | 102/102 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 39.345 µg/L 66% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 47.7 µg/L | 102/102 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 16.885 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.6 µg/L | 102/102 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 10.795 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.3 µg/L | 68/102 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 3.878 µg/L 26% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 15 µg/L | 49/122 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 2.6025 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.04 µg/L | 46/108 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 3.21 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.6 µg/L | 24/102 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0013 mg/L 8.5% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 22/22 | LCR | 2025 |
| Nitrate | 213 µg/L 2.1% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 18/20 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 4.62 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.9 µg/L | 13/102 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 13.4 µg/L 0.7% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 14 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Fluoride | 716.8 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 722 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 33.63 µg/L 0.3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 34 µg/L | 3/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Asbestos | 0.3776 MFL 5.4% of the EPA limit 7 MFL | 1/4 | SYR4 | 2012 |
| Cyanide | 7.68 µg/L 3.8% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.5 pCi/L 30% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2017 |
87 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about City of Lufkin
Is City of Lufkin tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in City of Lufkin's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in City of Lufkin's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does City of Lufkin serve?
City of Lufkin reports serving 51,236 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has City of Lufkin had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 14 violations on file for City of Lufkin, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.