← Texas

Tap water quality report

City of Lufkin

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 109 contaminants and detected 22. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

109
contaminants tested
22
detected
51,236
people served
8
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Angelina

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

8
health-based violations
14
violations on file
2
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 1999-04-01 → 1999-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1999-01-01 → 1999-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1998-10-01 → 1998-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1998-07-01 → 1998-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1998-07-01 → 1998-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1997-10-01 → 1997-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1997-10-01 → 1997-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1994-08-12 → 1997-08-11
RPT Monitoring Unaddressed 2025-07-02
Other Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0084 µg/L 3/3 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
511.5 µg/L 39%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 808 µg/L
120/122 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
22.095 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26.3 µg/L
108/108 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
30.975 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 33.8 µg/L
108/108 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
16.365 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20.3 µg/L
108/108 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
15.895 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18 µg/L
102/102 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
62.905 µg/L 79%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 69.4 µg/L
102/102 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
39.345 µg/L 66%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 47.7 µg/L
102/102 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
16.885 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.6 µg/L
102/102 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
10.795 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.3 µg/L
68/102 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
3.878 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 15 µg/L
49/122 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
2.6025 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.04 µg/L
46/108 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.21 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.6 µg/L
24/102 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0013 mg/L 8.5%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
22/22 LCR 2025
Nitrate
213 µg/L 2.1%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
18/20 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
4.62 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.9 µg/L
13/102 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
13.4 µg/L 0.7%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 14 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2016–2019
Fluoride
716.8 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 722 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2014–2018
Nitrate-Nitrite
33.63 µg/L 0.3%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 34 µg/L
3/4 SYR4 2012–2019
Asbestos
0.3776 MFL 5.4%
of the EPA limit 7 MFL
1/4 SYR4 2012
Cyanide
7.68 µg/L 3.8%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2014–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.5 pCi/L 30%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2017
87 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
HICKS, MARK
Phone
936-633-0211
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about City of Lufkin

Is City of Lufkin tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in City of Lufkin's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in City of Lufkin's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does City of Lufkin serve?

City of Lufkin reports serving 51,236 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has City of Lufkin had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 14 violations on file for City of Lufkin, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.