← Tennessee

Tap water quality report

Warren County Utility District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 61 contaminants and detected 5. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

61
contaminants tested
5
detected
29,055
people served
9
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Warren

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

9
health-based violations
21
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2016-01-01 → 2016-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2016-01-01 → 2016-03-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2010-10-02
TT Health-based Resolved 2010-10-02
TT Health-based Resolved 2010-10-02
Other Monitoring Unaddressed 2016-05-28

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFBS 0.0034 µg/L 1/4 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
107.25 µg/L 134%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 118 µg/L
96/96 SYR4 2014–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
61.675 µg/L 103%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 67.9 µg/L
96/96 SYR4 2014–2019
Nitrate
574 µg/L 5.7%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
12/12 SYR4 2014–2018
Lead
0.0010 mg/L 6.7%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
11/11 LCR 2025
56 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAtrazineBenzeneChlorobenzeneCarbon TetrachlorideDichloromethaneEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHfpo-DaLassoNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
PELHAM, ANTHONY
Phone
931-668-4175
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Warren County Utility District

Is Warren County Utility District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 5 contaminants in Warren County Utility District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Warren County Utility District's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Nitrate, Lead, PFBS. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Warren County Utility District serve?

Warren County Utility District reports serving 29,055 people in Tennessee, per its EPA record.

Has Warren County Utility District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 21 violations on file for Warren County Utility District, of which 9 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.