← Tennessee

Tap water quality report

H.B.& T.S. Utility District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 33 contaminants and detected 3. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

33
contaminants tested
3
detected
40,094
people served
34
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Williamson

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

34
health-based violations
53
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-04-01 → 2011-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-04-01 → 2011-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-04-01 → 2011-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-04-01 → 2011-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-08-01 → 2008-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-08-01 → 2008-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-08-01 → 2008-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-08-01 → 2008-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2008-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2008-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
78.225 µg/L 98%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 88 µg/L
96/96 SYR4 2014–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
44 µg/L 73%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 49 µg/L
95/96 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
0.0010 mg/L 6.7%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
11/11 LCR 2025
30 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaHfpo-DaNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact
LOVETT, CODY
Phone
615-794-7796
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about H.B.& T.S. Utility District

Is H.B.& T.S. Utility District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 3 contaminants in H.B.& T.S. Utility District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in H.B.& T.S. Utility District's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Lead. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does H.B.& T.S. Utility District serve?

H.B.& T.S. Utility District reports serving 40,094 people in Tennessee, per its EPA record.

Has H.B.& T.S. Utility District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 53 violations on file for H.B.& T.S. Utility District, of which 34 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.