← Tennessee

Tap water quality report

South Fork Utility District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 33 contaminants and detected 3. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

33
contaminants tested
3
detected
7,645
people served
12
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Sullivan

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

12
health-based violations
124
violations on file
3
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-06-01 → 2011-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-06-01 → 2011-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-06-01 → 2011-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-06-01 → 2011-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-08-01 → 2007-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-08-01 → 2007-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-08-01 → 2007-08-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
69.89 µg/L 87%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 78 µg/L
48/48 SYR4 2014–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
56.435 µg/L 94%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 81.2 µg/L
48/48 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
0.0015 mg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
11/11 LCR 2025
30 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaHfpo-DaNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact
WEBB, JASON
Phone
423-573-4173
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about South Fork Utility District

Is South Fork Utility District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 3 contaminants in South Fork Utility District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in South Fork Utility District's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Lead. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does South Fork Utility District serve?

South Fork Utility District reports serving 7,645 people in Tennessee, per its EPA record.

Has South Fork Utility District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 124 violations on file for South Fork Utility District, of which 12 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 3 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.