← Tennessee

Tap water quality report

Manchester Water Department

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 33 contaminants and detected 11. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

33
contaminants tested
11
detected
24,975
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Coffee

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
5
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
Other Monitoring Unaddressed 2025-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 1999-10-19
Other Monitoring Resolved 1999-10-19
Other Monitoring Resolved 1999-10-19
MR Monitoring Archived 1990-04-01 → 1990-04-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfpea 0.0063 µg/L 3/4 2025
Pfba 0.0058 µg/L 2/4 2025
PFBS 0.0103 µg/L 2/4 2025
Pfhxa 0.0075 µg/L 2/4 2025
PFOA 0.0116 µg/L 2/4 2025
Pfda 0.0030 µg/L 1/4 2025
Pfhpa 0.0042 µg/L 1/4 2025
PFOS 0.0066 µg/L 1/4 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
48.095 µg/L 60%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 65.9 µg/L
102/102 SYR4 2014–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
51.895 µg/L 86%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 68.3 µg/L
102/102 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
0.00070 mg/L 4.7%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
12/12 LCR 2025
22 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaHfpo-DaNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact
FOLEY, RONNIE
Phone
931-728-3991
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Manchester Water Department

Is Manchester Water Department tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 11 contaminants in Manchester Water Department's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Manchester Water Department's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Lead, Pfpea, Pfba, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Manchester Water Department serve?

Manchester Water Department reports serving 24,975 people in Tennessee, per its EPA record.

Has Manchester Water Department had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 5 violations on file for Manchester Water Department, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.