← Tennessee

Tap water quality report

Iron City Utility District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 3 contaminants and detected 3. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

3
contaminants tested
3
detected
729
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
GUP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Lawrence

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
50
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
Other Monitoring Unaddressed 2025-07-01
MR Monitoring Archived 2014-01-01 → 2014-03-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2014-01-01 → 2014-03-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2014-01-01 → 2014-03-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2014-01-01 → 2014-03-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2014-01-01 → 2014-03-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2014-01-01 → 2014-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2011-02-01 → 2011-02-28
MR Monitoring Resolved 2011-02-01 → 2011-02-28
MR Monitoring Resolved 2011-02-01 → 2011-02-28

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
25.405 µg/L 32%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 32.5 µg/L
12/13 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
0.0049 mg/L 33%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
10/10 LCR 2025
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
23.32 µg/L 39%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 32 µg/L
9/13 SYR4 2014–2019

Utility contact

Contact
BREWER, EDDIE
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Iron City Utility District

Is Iron City Utility District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 3 contaminants in Iron City Utility District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Iron City Utility District's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Lead, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5). The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Iron City Utility District serve?

Iron City Utility District reports serving 729 people in Tennessee, per its EPA record.

Has Iron City Utility District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 50 violations on file for Iron City Utility District, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.