← South Dakota

Tap water quality report

Autumn Meadows Sanitary District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 11 contaminants and detected 8. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

11
contaminants tested
8
detected
49
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Meade

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
84
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2006-04-01 → 2006-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2006-04-01 → 2006-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2006-04-01 → 2006-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2006-04-01 → 2006-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2006-04-01 → 2006-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2006-04-01 → 2006-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2006-04-01 → 2006-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2006-04-01 → 2006-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2006-04-01 → 2006-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2006-04-01 → 2006-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
89.3 µg/L 6.9%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 90 µg/L
15/15 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
5 µg/L 33%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
14/15 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0010 mg/L 6.7%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
9/9 LCR 2025
Nitrate
877 µg/L 8.8%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
4/6 SYR4 2017–2019
Combined Uranium
8.8 µg/L 29%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
13.5 pCi/L 90%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2019
TTHM
0.6400 µg/L 0.8%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
0.4200 µg/L 0.7%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2013–2019
3 contaminants tested, none detected
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)Gross Beta Particle ActivityNitrite

Utility contact

Contact
AL SAGE
Phone
6053917483
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Autumn Meadows Sanitary District

Is Autumn Meadows Sanitary District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 8 contaminants in Autumn Meadows Sanitary District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Autumn Meadows Sanitary District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Nitrate, Combined Uranium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Autumn Meadows Sanitary District serve?

Autumn Meadows Sanitary District reports serving 49 people in South Dakota, per its EPA record.

Has Autumn Meadows Sanitary District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 84 violations on file for Autumn Meadows Sanitary District, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.