← South Dakota

Tap water quality report

Spring Lake Colony

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 19 contaminants and detected 9. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

19
contaminants tested
9
detected
114
people served
3
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Kingsbury

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

3
health-based violations
299
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-10-01 → 2004-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-10-01 → 2004-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-10-01 → 2004-10-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-11-03 → 2020-08-27
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-11-03 → 2020-08-27
MR Monitoring Resolved 2004-10-01 → 2004-10-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2004-10-01 → 2004-10-31
Other Monitoring Resolved 2004-05-02

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
76 µg/L 5.8%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 90 µg/L
15/15 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
5.22 µg/L 35%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 9 µg/L
15/15 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0010 mg/L 6.7%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2025
Nitrite
214.5 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 220 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2017–2019
Arsenic
4 µg/L 40%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2013
Barium
15.6 µg/L 0.8%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2013
Chromium
2.1 µg/L 2.1%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2013
Fluoride
1000 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2013
Selenium
15.6 µg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2013
10 contaminants tested, none detected
Antimony, TotalBeryllium, TotalCadmiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)Combined UraniumGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityMercuryNitrateThallium, Total

Utility contact

Contact
TED DECKER
Phone
6054828030
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Spring Lake Colony

Is Spring Lake Colony tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 9 contaminants in Spring Lake Colony's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Spring Lake Colony's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Nitrite, Arsenic, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Spring Lake Colony serve?

Spring Lake Colony reports serving 114 people in South Dakota, per its EPA record.

Has Spring Lake Colony had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 299 violations on file for Spring Lake Colony, of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.