← South Dakota

Tap water quality report

Springfield

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 21 contaminants and detected 10. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

21
contaminants tested
10
detected
2,108
people served
32
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Bon Homme

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

32
health-based violations
58
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-02-01 → 2024-02-29
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-02-01 → 2024-02-29
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-02-01 → 2024-02-29
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-03-01 → 2019-03-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-03-01 → 2019-03-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-03-01 → 2019-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
103.77 µg/L 130%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 121 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
50.135 µg/L 84%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 78.2 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
116.5 µg/L 9%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 150 µg/L
30/30 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
6.655 µg/L 44%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 17.1 µg/L
30/30 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0010 mg/L 6.7%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2024
Nitrate
200 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
2/4 SYR4 2017–2018
Barium
8 µg/L 0.4%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2014
Chromium
1.5 µg/L 1.5%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2014
Fluoride
440 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2019
Selenium
1.8 µg/L 3.6%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2014
11 contaminants tested, none detected
Antimony, TotalArsenicBeryllium, TotalCadmiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)Combined UraniumGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityMercuryNitriteThallium, Total

Utility contact

Contact
JOE PRUSS-SHELHAMER
Phone
6053692928
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Springfield

Is Springfield tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in Springfield's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Springfield's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Copper, Lead, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Springfield serve?

Springfield reports serving 2,108 people in South Dakota, per its EPA record.

Has Springfield had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 58 violations on file for Springfield, of which 32 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.