← South Dakota

Tap water quality report

Pierre

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 41 contaminants and detected 8. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

41
contaminants tested
8
detected
14,091
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Hughes

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
9
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2008-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2008-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2008-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2008-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 1994-06-01 → 1994-06-30
MR Monitoring Archived 1994-06-01 → 1994-06-30
MR Monitoring Archived 1993-07-01 → 1993-07-31
MR Monitoring Archived 1976-07-01 → 1980-06-30
MR Monitoring Archived 1976-07-01 → 1980-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
1032 µg/L 79%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1240 µg/L
69/69 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
6 µg/L 40%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 30 µg/L
69/69 SYR4 2014–2017
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
6.376 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.2 µg/L
17/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0010 mg/L 6.7%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2023
TTHM
5.96 µg/L 7.5%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.29 µg/L
13/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
1100 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
4/72 SYR4 2017–2019
Lithium
25.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/4 UCMR-5 2025
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
3.7 pCi/L 25%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2014
33 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaCombined Radium (-226 And -228)Combined UraniumGross Beta Particle ActivityHfpo-DaNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitritePfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfuna

Utility contact

Contact
ROBERT TOWNLEY
Phone
6057737448
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Pierre

Is Pierre tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 8 contaminants in Pierre's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Pierre's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Lead, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Pierre serve?

Pierre reports serving 14,091 people in South Dakota, per its EPA record.

Has Pierre had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 9 violations on file for Pierre, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.