← South Dakota

Tap water quality report

Milbank

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 16 contaminants and detected 10. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

16
contaminants tested
10
detected
3,544
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Grant

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
4
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-06-06
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-06-06
MR Monitoring Archived 1976-07-01 → 1980-06-30
MR Monitoring Archived 1976-07-01 → 1980-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
1610 µg/L 124%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 2540 µg/L
160/160 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
3.12 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 11.5 µg/L
160/160 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
0.0020 mg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
18/18 LCR 2025
TTHM
79.005 µg/L 99%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 93.2 µg/L
18/18 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
65.65 µg/L 109%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 66.5 µg/L
18/18 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate
300 µg/L 3%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
2/6 SYR4 2017–2019
Arsenic
1 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2012
Barium
24.8 µg/L 1.2%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2012
Chromium
8.9 µg/L 8.9%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2012
Selenium
2.9 µg/L 5.8%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2012
6 contaminants tested, none detected
Antimony, TotalBeryllium, TotalCadmiumMercuryNitriteThallium, Total

Utility contact

Contact
JEREMY BREON
Phone
6054670494
Email
[email protected]; publicworks@m

Frequently asked questions about Milbank

Is Milbank tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in Milbank's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Milbank's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Milbank serve?

Milbank reports serving 3,544 people in South Dakota, per its EPA record.

Has Milbank had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 4 violations on file for Milbank, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.