← South Dakota

Tap water quality report

Southbrook Estates

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 11 contaminants and detected 5. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

11
contaminants tested
5
detected
28
people served
19
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Brookings

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

19
health-based violations
2,153
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2014-05-10
TT Health-based Resolved 2014-05-10
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-10-01 → 2013-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-10-01 → 2013-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-10-01 → 2013-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2011-11-22
TT Health-based Resolved 2011-11-22
TT Health-based Resolved 2010-02-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2010-02-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2007-02-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
1214.5 µg/L 93%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 2300 µg/L
30/30 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
4.215 µg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.6 µg/L
30/30 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
17/17 LCR 2023
TTHM
55.48 µg/L 69%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 56.4 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2013–2017
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
23.4 µg/L 39%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2013–2017
6 contaminants tested, none detected
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)Combined UraniumGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityNitrateNitrite

Utility contact

Contact
KELLY KOENIG
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Southbrook Estates

Is Southbrook Estates tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 5 contaminants in Southbrook Estates's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Southbrook Estates's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5). The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Southbrook Estates serve?

Southbrook Estates reports serving 28 people in South Dakota, per its EPA record.

Has Southbrook Estates had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 2153 violations on file for Southbrook Estates, of which 19 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.