Tap WaterIndex

← South Carolina

Tap water quality report

Lcf Water District (sc4220010)

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 44 contaminants and detected 12. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

44
contaminants tested
12
detected
18,152
people served
0
health-based violations
South Carolina rankingsLead in South CarolinaPFAS in South Carolina
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Spartanburg

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
2
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 1993-01-01
MR Monitoring Archived 1992-02-01 → 1992-02-29

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
9.87 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.8 µg/L
124/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
49.74 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 57.2 µg/L
124/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
20.375 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 36.38 µg/L
124/124 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
59.985 µg/L 75%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 67.8 µg/L
124/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
45.0075 µg/L 75%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 86.49 µg/L
124/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
29.438 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 48.28 µg/L
124/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L
95/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
197.2 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 420 µg/L
89/90 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 14/14 LCR 2025
Monobromoacetic Acid
3.7325 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.87 µg/L
12/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
5.915 µg/L 39%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 7 µg/L
8/90 SYR4 2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.128 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.36 µg/L
5/124 SYR4 2012–2019
32 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaBromoformDibromoacetic AcidHfpo-DaNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact
OLIVER, MARK
Phone
864-978-9838
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Lcf Water District (sc4220010)

Is Lcf Water District (sc4220010) tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Lcf Water District (sc4220010)'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Lcf Water District (sc4220010)'s water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Lcf Water District (sc4220010) serve?

Lcf Water District (sc4220010) reports serving 18,152 people in South Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Lcf Water District (sc4220010) had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 2 violations on file for Lcf Water District (sc4220010), of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.