Tap WaterIndex

← South Carolina

Tap water quality report

Sws-Landrum Wtp (sc4210003)

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 105 contaminants and detected 13. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

105
contaminants tested
13
detected
5,143
people served
7
health-based violations
South Carolina rankingsLead in South CarolinaPFAS in South Carolina
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Spartanburg

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

7
health-based violations
33
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2006-05-01 → 2006-05-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2006-05-01 → 2006-05-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2006-05-01 → 2006-05-31
TT Health-based Archived 1995-05-01 → 1995-05-31
TT Health-based Archived 1995-05-01 → 1995-05-31
TT Health-based Archived 1995-02-01 → 1995-02-28
TT Health-based Archived 1995-02-01 → 1995-02-28
MR Monitoring Resolved 1999-09-01 → 1999-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 1999-09-01 → 1999-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 1999-09-01 → 1999-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
261 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 370 µg/L
61/63 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
18.284 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23.6 µg/L
57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
45.86 µg/L 76%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 46.9 µg/L
57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
27.216 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 31.4 µg/L
57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
7.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.9 µg/L
56/56 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
51.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 63.6 µg/L
56/56 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
61.25 µg/L 77%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 75.1 µg/L
56/56 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 17/17 LCR 2025
Lead
17 µg/L 113%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 23 µg/L
16/63 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate
140 µg/L 1.4%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.645 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L
12/56 SYR4 2012–2019
Xylenes, Total
3.714 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.27 µg/L
5/21 SYR4 2012–2019
Ethylbenzene
0.9000 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 700 µg/L
 1/21 SYR4 2012–2019
92 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndrinFluorideGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
TUCK, KEN
Phone
864-580-5642
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Sws-Landrum Wtp (sc4210003)

Is Sws-Landrum Wtp (sc4210003) tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Sws-Landrum Wtp (sc4210003)'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Sws-Landrum Wtp (sc4210003)'s water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Dichloroacetic Acid, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Trichloroacetic Acid, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Sws-Landrum Wtp (sc4210003) serve?

Sws-Landrum Wtp (sc4210003) reports serving 5,143 people in South Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Sws-Landrum Wtp (sc4210003) had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 33 violations on file for Sws-Landrum Wtp (sc4210003), of which 7 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.