Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-09-01 → 2008-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-09-01 → 2008-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-09-01 → 2008-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-09-01 → 2008-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2003-07-01 → 2003-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2003-07-01 → 2003-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2003-07-01 → 2003-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1992-12-01 → 1992-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1992-12-01 → 1992-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1992-10-01 → 1992-10-31 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 13.5135 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.17 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 23.485 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27.18 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 56.467 µg/L 71% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 63.92 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 51.339 µg/L 86% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 59.69 µg/L | 122/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 17.95 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26.92 µg/L | 121/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 33.185 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 41.88 µg/L | 116/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 7.65 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.33 µg/L | 108/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 23.535 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25.17 µg/L | 103/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 286 µg/L 22% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1200 µg/L | 85/88 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 13.605 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.34 µg/L | 51/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 55.55 µg/L 370% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 490 µg/L | 34/88 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 17.1735 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.19 µg/L | 20/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 20/20 | LCR | 2025 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 19.561 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20.52 µg/L | 2/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
23 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Fort Jackson (sc4010501)
Is Fort Jackson (sc4010501) tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Fort Jackson (sc4010501)'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Fort Jackson (sc4010501)'s water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Fort Jackson (sc4010501) serve?
Fort Jackson (sc4010501) reports serving 31,000 people in South Carolina, per its EPA record.
Has Fort Jackson (sc4010501) had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 40 violations on file for Fort Jackson (sc4010501), of which 17 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.