← South Carolina

Tap water quality report

Columbia City of (sc4010001)

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 105 contaminants and detected 24. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

105
contaminants tested
24
detected
354,068
people served
55
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Richland

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

55
health-based violations
66
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-12-01 → 2024-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-12-01 → 2024-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-12-01 → 2024-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-12-01 → 2024-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-04-01 → 2021-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-04-01 → 2021-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-04-01 → 2021-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-04-01 → 2021-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-04-01 → 2021-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-04-01 → 2021-04-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfhxa 0.0057 µg/L 8/8 2025
Pfpea 0.0068 µg/L 8/8 2025
PFOA 0.0069 µg/L 6/8 2025
PFOS 0.0086 µg/L 6/8 2025
Hfpo-Da 0.0092 µg/L 5/8 2025
PFBS 0.0052 µg/L 4/8 2025
Pfhpa 0.0030 µg/L 1/8 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
11.576 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.43 µg/L
312/312 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
46.152 µg/L 58%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 64.7 µg/L
312/312 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
53.8685 µg/L 90%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 68.6 µg/L
312/312 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
20.8815 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 37.79 µg/L
312/312 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
28.875 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 44.47 µg/L
311/312 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
33.1375 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 42.45 µg/L
308/312 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
6.0805 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.37 µg/L
284/312 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
7.95 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28.24 µg/L
277/312 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
11.17 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.53 µg/L
105/312 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
96.2 µg/L 7.4%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 450 µg/L
99/100 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
7.44 µg/L 50%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 13 µg/L
33/100 SYR4 2014–2017
Nitrate
461 µg/L 4.6%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 470 µg/L
30/34 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0050 mg/L 33%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
21/21 LCR 2023
Bromoform
16.4185 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.28 µg/L
18/312 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
654 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 670 µg/L
17/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
22.2168 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23.4888 µg/L
8/312 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
240 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
1/17 SYR4 2012–2019
81 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
SHEALY, CLINT
Phone
803-545-3400
Email
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Columbia City of (sc4010001)

Is Columbia City of (sc4010001) tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 24 contaminants in Columbia City of (sc4010001)'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Columbia City of (sc4010001)'s water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Trichloroacetic Acid, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Columbia City of (sc4010001) serve?

Columbia City of (sc4010001) reports serving 354,068 people in South Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Columbia City of (sc4010001) had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 66 violations on file for Columbia City of (sc4010001), of which 55 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.