Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-06-01 → 1996-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-06-01 → 1996-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-06-01 → 1996-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 1992-02-01 → 1992-02-29 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 8.6805 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.9 µg/L | 62/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 38.325 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 49.5 µg/L | 62/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 23.89 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25.87 µg/L | 62/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 47.375 µg/L 59% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 61.2 µg/L | 62/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 42.585 µg/L 71% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 50.35 µg/L | 62/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 19.26 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.48 µg/L | 62/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 199.5 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 9200 µg/L | 40/40 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.725 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2 µg/L | 36/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 53.5 µg/L 357% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 62 µg/L | 18/40 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 16/16 | LCR | 2023 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.526 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.59 µg/L | 5/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
32 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Dacusville-Cedar Rock Wt Co (sc3920008)
Is Dacusville-Cedar Rock Wt Co (sc3920008) tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Dacusville-Cedar Rock Wt Co (sc3920008)'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Dacusville-Cedar Rock Wt Co (sc3920008)'s water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Dacusville-Cedar Rock Wt Co (sc3920008) serve?
Dacusville-Cedar Rock Wt Co (sc3920008) reports serving 8,700 people in South Carolina, per its EPA record.
Has Dacusville-Cedar Rock Wt Co (sc3920008) had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 4 violations on file for Dacusville-Cedar Rock Wt Co (sc3920008), of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.