← South Carolina

Tap water quality report

Six Mile W/D (sc3920002)

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 44 contaminants and detected 11. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

44
contaminants tested
11
detected
14,845
people served
1
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Pickens

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

1
health-based violations
14
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Archived 1992-01-01 → 2000-09-14
MON Monitoring Resolved 2024-05-01 → 2024-05-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2024-05-01 → 2024-05-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2024-05-01 → 2024-05-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2024-05-01 → 2024-05-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-05-01 → 2024-05-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-05-01 → 2024-05-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-05-01 → 2024-05-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-05-01 → 2024-05-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
2.8855 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.27 µg/L
112/112 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
11.145 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 44.74 µg/L
112/112 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
10.69 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23.89 µg/L
112/112 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
13.845 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 53.01 µg/L
112/112 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
14.935 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 54.62 µg/L
112/112 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
4.235 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29.64 µg/L
112/112 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
68.7 µg/L 5.3%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 80 µg/L
54/60 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
35.45 µg/L 236%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 82 µg/L
20/60 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
0.0021 mg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
17/17 LCR 2023
Dibromochloromethane
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/112 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.3845 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L
2/112 SYR4 2012–2019
33 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaBromoformDibromoacetic AcidHfpo-DaMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact
POWELL, BREANNE
Phone
864-868-0942
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Six Mile W/D (sc3920002)

Is Six Mile W/D (sc3920002) tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 11 contaminants in Six Mile W/D (sc3920002)'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Six Mile W/D (sc3920002)'s water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Six Mile W/D (sc3920002) serve?

Six Mile W/D (sc3920002) reports serving 14,845 people in South Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Six Mile W/D (sc3920002) had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 14 violations on file for Six Mile W/D (sc3920002), of which 1 is health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.