← South Carolina

Tap water quality report

Chickasaw Point (sc3750010)

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 9. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
9
detected
823
people served
7
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Oconee

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

7
health-based violations
43
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-09-01 → 1996-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-09-01 → 1996-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-09-01 → 1996-09-30
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
108.5 µg/L 8.3%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 120 µg/L
24/25 SYR4 2014–2018
Bromodichloromethane
8.26 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.4 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2014–2019
Chloroform
71.245 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 81.6 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2014–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
24.125 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.6 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2014–2019
TTHM
80.42 µg/L 101%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 92.2 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2014–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
53.225 µg/L 89%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 57.5 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2014–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
29.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32.9 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
0.0070 mg/L 47%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
16/16 LCR 2024
Dibromochloromethane
1.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L
11/20 SYR4 2014–2019
5 contaminants tested, none detected
BromoformDibromoacetic AcidLeadMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
ROSE, LISA
Phone
864-972-3680
Email
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Chickasaw Point (sc3750010)

Is Chickasaw Point (sc3750010) tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 9 contaminants in Chickasaw Point (sc3750010)'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Chickasaw Point (sc3750010)'s water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Chickasaw Point (sc3750010) serve?

Chickasaw Point (sc3750010) reports serving 823 people in South Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Chickasaw Point (sc3750010) had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 43 violations on file for Chickasaw Point (sc3750010), of which 7 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.