← South Carolina

Tap water quality report

Isaqueena Point Util Sys (sc3750008)

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 10. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
10
detected
38
people served
15
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Oconee

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

15
health-based violations
32
violations on file
2
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-07-01 → 2006-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-07-01 → 2006-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-07-01 → 2006-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-07-01 → 2006-07-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2004-09-01 → 2004-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2004-09-01 → 2004-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2003-04-01 → 2003-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2003-04-01 → 2003-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2003-01-01 → 2003-01-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2003-01-01 → 2003-01-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
89.25 µg/L 6.9%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 123 µg/L
16/25 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2021
Bromodichloromethane
6.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
8/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Chloroform
45.37 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 46 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
16.525 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.7 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2014–2019
TTHM
52.805 µg/L 66%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 53.4 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
26.455 µg/L 44%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 26.7 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
9.93 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.575 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L
6/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
16 µg/L 107%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
1/25 SYR4 2012–2018
4 contaminants tested, none detected
BromoformDibromoacetic AcidMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
BOROW, TIMOTHY
Phone
864-506-1321
Email
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Isaqueena Point Util Sys (sc3750008)

Is Isaqueena Point Util Sys (sc3750008) tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in Isaqueena Point Util Sys (sc3750008)'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Isaqueena Point Util Sys (sc3750008)'s water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Isaqueena Point Util Sys (sc3750008) serve?

Isaqueena Point Util Sys (sc3750008) reports serving 38 people in South Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Isaqueena Point Util Sys (sc3750008) had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 32 violations on file for Isaqueena Point Util Sys (sc3750008), of which 15 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.