Tap WaterIndex

← South Carolina

Tap water quality report

Walhalla City of (sc3710004)

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 107 contaminants and detected 15. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

107
contaminants tested
15
detected
16,010
people served
3
health-based violations
South Carolina rankingsLead in South CarolinaPFAS in South Carolina
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Oconee

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

3
health-based violations
30
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-08-01 → 2002-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-08-01 → 2002-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-08-01 → 2002-08-31
MR Monitoring Unaddressed 2025-10-01
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-02
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-02
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-02
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
9.63 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13 µg/L
128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
75.39 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 96 µg/L
128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
35.465 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 40.3 µg/L
128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
85.56 µg/L 107%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 105.7 µg/L
128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
67.265 µg/L 112%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 73.4 µg/L
128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
33.9795 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 39.5 µg/L
128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
280 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 447 µg/L
85/87 SYR4 2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L
35/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.57 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L
27/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 23/23 LCR 2025
Nitrate
240 µg/L 2.4%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 18/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
29.4 µg/L 196%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 47 µg/L
17/87 SYR4 2013–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
3.165 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.24 µg/L
11/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
696 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 720 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
210 µg/L 2.1%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 2/2 SYR4 2012–2017
92 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
MYERS, CELIA
Phone
864-723-4141
Email
[email protected]; [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Walhalla City of (sc3710004)

Is Walhalla City of (sc3710004) tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Walhalla City of (sc3710004)'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Walhalla City of (sc3710004)'s water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Walhalla City of (sc3710004) serve?

Walhalla City of (sc3710004) reports serving 16,010 people in South Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Walhalla City of (sc3710004) had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 30 violations on file for Walhalla City of (sc3710004), of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.