Tap WaterIndex

← South Carolina

Tap water quality report

Mccormick Cpw (sc3510001)

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 75 contaminants and detected 15. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

75
contaminants tested
15
detected
1,749
people served
31
health-based violations
South Carolina rankingsLead in South CarolinaPFAS in South Carolina
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
McCormick

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

31
health-based violations
58
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-07-01 → 2022-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-07-01 → 2022-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-07-01 → 2022-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-07-01 → 2022-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-07-01 → 2022-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
12.12 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.6 µg/L
57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
68.36 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 80.4 µg/L
57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
74.36 µg/L 93%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 95.2 µg/L
57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
23.95 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26.4 µg/L
56/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
48.7 µg/L 81%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 60 µg/L
56/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
30.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 35.9 µg/L
56/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.23 µg/L
45/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
367.5 µg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 430 µg/L
30/30 SYR4 2012–2018
Nitrate
110 µg/L 1.1%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 15/15 LCR 2024
Fluoride
660 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 680 µg/L
5/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
3.899 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.96 µg/L
3/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
4.95 µg/L 33%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 5 µg/L
2/30 SYR4 2012–2018
Benzene
0.5800 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
 1/19 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/57 SYR4 2012–2019
60 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
DANIELS, CHERYL
Phone
864-852-2224
Email
[email protected]; [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Mccormick Cpw (sc3510001)

Is Mccormick Cpw (sc3510001) tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Mccormick Cpw (sc3510001)'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Mccormick Cpw (sc3510001)'s water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Dichloroacetic Acid, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Mccormick Cpw (sc3510001) serve?

Mccormick Cpw (sc3510001) reports serving 1,749 people in South Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Mccormick Cpw (sc3510001) had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 58 violations on file for Mccormick Cpw (sc3510001), of which 31 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.