Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1996-06-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 1991-09-01 → 1991-09-30 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 61.4 µg/L 4.7% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 102 µg/L | 73/81 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 10.6535 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.17 µg/L | 48/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 38.4195 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 48.42 µg/L | 48/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 49.4145 µg/L 62% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 65.4 µg/L | 48/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 63.165 µg/L 105% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 69.58 µg/L | 48/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 28.7145 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29.88 µg/L | 48/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 35.066 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 48.42 µg/L | 45/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 4.1785 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.79 µg/L | 34/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.304 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.81 µg/L | 25/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0230 mg/L 153% above the EPA limit of 0.0150 mg/L | 17/17 | LCR | 2025 |
| Lead | 5.43 µg/L 36% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6 µg/L | 7/81 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.756 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L | 5/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2.7555 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.78 µg/L | 2/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
27 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Bgwc i-20 (sc3250012)
Is Bgwc i-20 (sc3250012) tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Bgwc i-20 (sc3250012)'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Bgwc i-20 (sc3250012)'s water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Bgwc i-20 (sc3250012) serve?
Bgwc i-20 (sc3250012) reports serving 7,146 people in South Carolina, per its EPA record.
Has Bgwc i-20 (sc3250012) had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 17 violations on file for Bgwc i-20 (sc3250012), of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.