← South Carolina

Tap water quality report

West Columbia City of (sc3210004)

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 105 contaminants and detected 21. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

105
contaminants tested
21
detected
34,028
people served
4
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Lexington

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
22
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30
MR Monitoring Archived 2002-08-01 → 2002-08-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 1994-07-01 → 1994-07-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 1994-07-01 → 1994-07-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 1993-07-01 → 1993-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 1993-04-01 → 1993-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 1993-01-01 → 1993-03-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Hfpo-Da 0.0097 µg/L 8/8 2025
Pfhxa 0.0053 µg/L 8/8 2025
PFOS 0.0079 µg/L 8/8 2025
Pfpea 0.0059 µg/L 8/8 2025
PFOA 0.0061 µg/L 7/8 2025
PFBS 0.0041 µg/L 4/8 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
21.08 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 35.56 µg/L
151/156 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
50.075 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 81.16 µg/L
151/156 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
84.21 µg/L 105%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 103.41 µg/L
151/156 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
31.8975 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 40.99 µg/L
150/156 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
59.901 µg/L 100%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 74.6 µg/L
150/156 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
30.599 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 37.57 µg/L
150/156 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
71.5 µg/L 5.5%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 119 µg/L
130/150 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
9.008 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.77 µg/L
114/156 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
9.837 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.91 µg/L
95/156 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
370.5 µg/L 3.7%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 420 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0030 mg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
21/21 LCR 2025
Dibromoacetic Acid
5.66 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.29 µg/L
16/156 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
1180 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1600 µg/L
15/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
4.8 µg/L 32%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6 µg/L
7/150 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
3.3175 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.37 µg/L
4/156 SYR4 2012–2019
84 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
CARTER, BRIAN
Phone
803-939-8600
Email
[email protected]; [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about West Columbia City of (sc3210004)

Is West Columbia City of (sc3210004) tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in West Columbia City of (sc3210004)'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in West Columbia City of (sc3210004)'s water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Dichloroacetic Acid, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does West Columbia City of (sc3210004) serve?

West Columbia City of (sc3210004) reports serving 34,028 people in South Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has West Columbia City of (sc3210004) had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 22 violations on file for West Columbia City of (sc3210004), of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.