Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-11-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-11-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2014-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2014-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2014-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 1992-07-01 → 1993-03-17 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 1992-07-01 → 1993-03-17 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 1992-07-01 → 1993-03-17 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chloroform | 38.1772 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 47.14 µg/L | 90/90 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 48.0152 µg/L 60% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 54.6 µg/L | 90/90 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 58.3055 µg/L 97% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 71.5 µg/L | 90/90 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 11.308 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.8 µg/L | 89/90 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 20.43 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23.23 µg/L | 89/90 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 33.592 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 41.19 µg/L | 88/90 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 5.3775 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.09 µg/L | 74/90 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 150 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 200 µg/L | 56/59 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 3.054 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.68 µg/L | 33/90 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 14.6 µg/L 97% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 18 µg/L | 18/59 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 0.00024 mg/L 1.6% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 16/16 | LCR | 2023 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 5.6015 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.97 µg/L | 12/90 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 3.148 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.16 µg/L | 5/90 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
24 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Conway Rural (sc2620001)
Is Conway Rural (sc2620001) tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Conway Rural (sc2620001)'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Conway Rural (sc2620001)'s water?
EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Conway Rural (sc2620001) serve?
Conway Rural (sc2620001) reports serving 12,740 people in South Carolina, per its EPA record.
Has Conway Rural (sc2620001) had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 13 violations on file for Conway Rural (sc2620001), of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.