Tap WaterIndex

← South Carolina

Tap water quality report

Greer Cpw (sc2310005)

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 105 contaminants and detected 16. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

105
contaminants tested
16
detected
54,024
people served
13
health-based violations
South Carolina rankingsLead in South CarolinaPFAS in South Carolina
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Greenville

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

13
health-based violations
24
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2003-04-01 → 2003-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2003-04-01 → 2003-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2003-04-01 → 2003-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2003-04-01 → 2003-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2003-04-01 → 2003-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-10-01 → 2002-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-10-01 → 2002-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-10-01 → 2002-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-10-01 → 2002-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-10-01 → 2002-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
7.0325 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.14 µg/L
128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
37.065 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 46.1 µg/L
128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
21.595 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 31.23 µg/L
128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
42.265 µg/L 53%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 52.5 µg/L
128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
35.9 µg/L 60%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 51.88 µg/L
128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
14.037 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.56 µg/L
128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
117.5 µg/L 9%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 190 µg/L
76/90 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 50/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 19/19 LCR 2025
Lead
26.4 µg/L 176%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 28 µg/L
17/90 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate
360 µg/L 3.6%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
3.2595 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.32 µg/L
12/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
659.5 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 670 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 4/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
0.2600 µg/L 0.5%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
 1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Xylenes, Total
1.05 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 1/11 SYR4 2012–2019
89 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
REGIER, MARC
Phone
864-968-3251
Email
[email protected]; [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Greer Cpw (sc2310005)

Is Greer Cpw (sc2310005) tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Greer Cpw (sc2310005)'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Greer Cpw (sc2310005)'s water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Greer Cpw (sc2310005) serve?

Greer Cpw (sc2310005) reports serving 54,024 people in South Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Greer Cpw (sc2310005) had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 24 violations on file for Greer Cpw (sc2310005), of which 13 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.