← South Carolina

Tap water quality report

Georgetown City of (sc2210001)

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 105 contaminants and detected 26. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

105
contaminants tested
26
detected
9,092
people served
49
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Georgetown

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

49
health-based violations
69
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2003-04-01 → 2003-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2003-04-01 → 2003-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2003-04-01 → 2003-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2003-04-01 → 2003-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2003-04-01 → 2003-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2003-04-01 → 2003-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-10-01 → 2002-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-10-01 → 2002-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-10-01 → 2002-12-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFOA 0.0083 µg/L 4/4 2024
PFOS 0.0097 µg/L 4/4 2024
Pfhxa 0.0052 µg/L 3/4 2024
Pfpea 0.0050 µg/L 3/4 2024
PFBS 0.0046 µg/L 2/4 2024
Pfhpa 0.0041 µg/L 1/4 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Dibromochloromethane
10.537 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.7 µg/L
78/78 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
80.4445 µg/L 101%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 103.1 µg/L
78/78 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
58.0905 µg/L 97%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 74.17 µg/L
78/78 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
20.19 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26.05 µg/L
77/78 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
8.3725 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.84 µg/L
76/78 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
56.21 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 76.52 µg/L
71/78 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
33.49 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 41.5 µg/L
61/78 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
21.88 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27.03 µg/L
61/78 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
161 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 220 µg/L
60/60 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
6.628 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.68 µg/L
50/78 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
31.451 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 33.98 µg/L
39/78 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
17.95 µg/L 120%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 460 µg/L
35/60 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate
620 µg/L 6.2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
20/44 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0074 mg/L 49%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
15/15 LCR 2025
Fluoride
1068 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1100 µg/L
5/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
70 µg/L 3.5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
1/13 SYR4 2012–2019
Dalapon
1.2 µg/L 0.6%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
1/13 SYR4 2012–2019
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
4.9 µg/L 82%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
1/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
2.4 pCi/L 16%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
1/3 SYR4 2015
Toluene
0.5700 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
1/15 SYR4 2012–2019
79 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
GADDY, PAM
Phone
843-545-4511
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Georgetown City of (sc2210001)

Is Georgetown City of (sc2210001) tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 26 contaminants in Georgetown City of (sc2210001)'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Georgetown City of (sc2210001)'s water?

EPA monitoring detected Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Monobromoacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Georgetown City of (sc2210001) serve?

Georgetown City of (sc2210001) reports serving 9,092 people in South Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Georgetown City of (sc2210001) had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 69 violations on file for Georgetown City of (sc2210001), of which 49 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.