← South Carolina

Tap water quality report

Winnsboro Town of (2010001)

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 105 contaminants and detected 20. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

105
contaminants tested
20
detected
10,391
people served
35
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Fairfield

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

35
health-based violations
61
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2013-09-01 → 2013-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2013-09-01 → 2013-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2013-09-01 → 2013-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2013-09-01 → 2013-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2011-10-01 → 2011-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2011-10-01 → 2011-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2011-10-01 → 2011-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2011-10-01 → 2011-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2011-10-01 → 2011-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2011-07-01 → 2011-09-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfhxa 0.0038 µg/L 2/4 2024
PFHXS 0.0090 µg/L 2/4 2024
PFOS 0.0328 µg/L 2/4 2024
Pfpea 0.0038 µg/L 2/4 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
56.65 µg/L 94%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 68 µg/L
66/78 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
14.264 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.28 µg/L
65/78 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
64.01 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 78.66 µg/L
65/78 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
30.398 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 35.78 µg/L
65/78 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
79.276 µg/L 99%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 94.9 µg/L
65/78 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
25.608 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32 µg/L
65/78 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
3.618 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.54 µg/L
53/78 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
5.952 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.32 µg/L
48/78 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
180 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 463 µg/L
36/40 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
0.0120 mg/L 80%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
20/20 LCR 2025
Nitrate
320 µg/L 3.2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.82 µg/L
11/78 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
14 µg/L 93%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
10/40 SYR4 2014–2017
Fluoride
574 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 580 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
51 µg/L 2.6%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
1.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/78 SYR4 2012–2019
85 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
CLAUSON, CHRISTOPHER
Phone
803-635-6364
Email
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Winnsboro Town of (2010001)

Is Winnsboro Town of (2010001) tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Winnsboro Town of (2010001)'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Winnsboro Town of (2010001)'s water?

EPA monitoring detected Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Winnsboro Town of (2010001) serve?

Winnsboro Town of (2010001) reports serving 10,391 people in South Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Winnsboro Town of (2010001) had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 61 violations on file for Winnsboro Town of (2010001), of which 35 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.