← South Carolina

Tap water quality report

Darlington County W&Sa (sc1620001)

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 109 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

109
contaminants tested
19
detected
52,288
people served
16
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Darlington

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

16
health-based violations
16
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-04-01 → 2010-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-04-01 → 2010-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-04-01 → 2010-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-04-01 → 2010-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-10-01 → 2009-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
247.5 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 370 µg/L
56/60 SYR4 2014–2017
Nitrate
1200 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
46/48 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
2.804 pCi/L 56%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 5.4 pCi/L
33/45 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0016 mg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
20/20 LCR 2023
Lead
7.33 µg/L 49%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.1 µg/L
12/60 SYR4 2014–2017
TTHM
2.6585 µg/L 3.3%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.78 µg/L
10/98 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
29.432 µg/L 49%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 29.82 µg/L
9/98 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
2.384 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.51 µg/L
8/98 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
1031 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1100 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2014–2018
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
4.625 pCi/L 31%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 5 pCi/L
6/37 SYR4 2012–2018
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE
0.0342 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 0.2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.0360 µg/L
5/19 SYR4 2014–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
29.723 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29.82 µg/L
3/98 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.401 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.43 µg/L
3/98 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
1.504 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.53 µg/L
2/98 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.36178 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.3655 µg/L
2/98 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.37 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/98 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/98 SYR4 2012–2019
Ethylene Dibromide
0.0220 µg/L 44%
of the EPA limit 0.0500 µg/L
1/19 SYR4 2014–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
200 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2019
90 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
SMITH, ROB
Phone
843-393-8131
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Darlington County W&Sa (sc1620001)

Is Darlington County W&Sa (sc1620001) tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Darlington County W&Sa (sc1620001)'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Darlington County W&Sa (sc1620001)'s water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate, Combined Radium (-226 And -228), Lead, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Darlington County W&Sa (sc1620001) serve?

Darlington County W&Sa (sc1620001) reports serving 52,288 people in South Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Darlington County W&Sa (sc1620001) had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 16 violations on file for Darlington County W&Sa (sc1620001), of which 16 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.