← South Carolina

Tap water quality report

Jefferson Town of (sc1310005)

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 10. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
10
detected
948
people served
3
health-based violations
Water source
GWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Chesterfield

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

3
health-based violations
24
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 1998-07-01 → 1998-07-31
TT Health-based Resolved 1998-07-01 → 1998-07-31
TT Health-based Resolved 1998-07-01 → 1998-07-31
Other Monitoring Resolved 2007-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2007-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2007-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2003-05-01 → 2003-05-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2002-01-01 → 2002-01-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2001-11-01 → 2001-11-30
MR Monitoring Archived 2001-10-01 → 2001-10-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0046 mg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2024
Copper
65 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 77 µg/L
11/30 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
15 µg/L 100%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 17 µg/L
9/30 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromochloromethane
1.9975 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.04 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2014–2019
TTHM
4.75 µg/L 5.9%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.93 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromodichloromethane
1.7705 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.88 µg/L
4/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromoform
1.19 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Chloroform
1.01 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.7958 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
1.7958 µg/L 3%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
1/6 SYR4 2014–2019
4 contaminants tested, none detected
Dibromoacetic AcidDichloroacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidTrichloroacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
MILLER, JAMES M
Phone
843-658-7877
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Jefferson Town of (sc1310005)

Is Jefferson Town of (sc1310005) tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in Jefferson Town of (sc1310005)'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Jefferson Town of (sc1310005)'s water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Copper, Lead, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Jefferson Town of (sc1310005) serve?

Jefferson Town of (sc1310005) reports serving 948 people in South Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Jefferson Town of (sc1310005) had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 24 violations on file for Jefferson Town of (sc1310005), of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.