Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-12-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-12-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-12-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-12-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-12-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-12-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-12-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-12-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-12-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-12-01 → 2021-12-31 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| PFBS | 0.0034 µg/L | 3/4 | 2024 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 222 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 540 µg/L | 101/120 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 51.655 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 107.9 µg/L | 100/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 65.02 µg/L 81% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 124.4 µg/L | 100/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 9.51 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.6 µg/L | 99/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 26.91 µg/L 45% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 34.4 µg/L | 99/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 11.515 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.6 µg/L | 98/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 14.625 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23 µg/L | 96/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 3.31 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.2 µg/L | 87/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.24 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L | 13/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 5.63 µg/L 38% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.4 µg/L | 12/120 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 10/10 | LCR | 2025 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
31 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Electric City Utilities (sc0410012)
Is Electric City Utilities (sc0410012) tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Electric City Utilities (sc0410012)'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Electric City Utilities (sc0410012)'s water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Chloroform, TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Electric City Utilities (sc0410012) serve?
Electric City Utilities (sc0410012) reports serving 38,204 people in South Carolina, per its EPA record.
Has Electric City Utilities (sc0410012) had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 14 violations on file for Electric City Utilities (sc0410012), of which 10 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.