← Rhode Island

Tap water quality report

Warwick-City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 44 contaminants and detected 14. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

44
contaminants tested
14
detected
73,289
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Kent

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
82
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2021-12-11
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2021-12-11
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2021-12-11
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2021-12-11
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2021-12-11
Other Monitoring Resolved 2021-09-05
Other Monitoring Resolved 2021-09-05
Other Monitoring Resolved 2021-09-05
Other Monitoring Resolved 2021-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2021-07-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
28.3 µg/L 47%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 31.9 µg/L
238/240 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
76.15 µg/L 95%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 94.8 µg/L
236/240 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
20 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26 µg/L
158/160 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromodichloromethane
5.655 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 207 µg/L
150/152 SYR4 2014–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
2.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.3 µg/L
145/160 SYR4 2014–2019
Chloroform
72 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 91 µg/L
140/152 SYR4 2014–2019
Copper
17.77 µg/L 1.4%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 93 µg/L
130/139 SYR4 2015–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.935 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L
74/160 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
19.8 µg/L 132%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 31 µg/L
62/139 SYR4 2015–2019
Lead
0.0019 mg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
25/25 LCR 2025
Dibromochloromethane
1.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L
22/152 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
15/160 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromoform
43.65 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 44 µg/L
8/152 SYR4 2014–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.565 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L
8/160 SYR4 2014–2019
30 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaHfpo-DaNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact
OUILLETTE, GERALD
Phone
401-921-9798
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Warwick-City of

Is Warwick-City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Warwick-City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Warwick-City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), TTHM, Dichloroacetic Acid, Bromodichloromethane, Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Warwick-City of serve?

Warwick-City of reports serving 73,289 people in Rhode Island, per its EPA record.

Has Warwick-City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 82 violations on file for Warwick-City of, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.