← Rhode Island

Tap water quality report

Smithfield Water Supply Board

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 35 contaminants and detected 5. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

35
contaminants tested
5
detected
9,460
people served
55
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Providence

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

55
health-based violations
104
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
20 µg/L 1.5%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 74.5 µg/L
64/80 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
93.005 µg/L 116%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 138.8 µg/L
64/64 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
25.3 µg/L 42%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 67.8 µg/L
64/64 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0015 mg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
32/32 LCR 2025
Lead
8.75 µg/L 58%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 27 µg/L
27/80 SYR4 2013–2019
30 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaHfpo-DaNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact
ALLEN, GENE
Phone
401-233-1034
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Smithfield Water Supply Board

Is Smithfield Water Supply Board tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 5 contaminants in Smithfield Water Supply Board's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Smithfield Water Supply Board's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Lead, Lead. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Smithfield Water Supply Board serve?

Smithfield Water Supply Board reports serving 9,460 people in Rhode Island, per its EPA record.

Has Smithfield Water Supply Board had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 104 violations on file for Smithfield Water Supply Board, of which 55 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.