Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2014-11-01 → 2014-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2014-11-01 → 2014-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2014-11-01 → 2014-11-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2004-10-01 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| PFOA | 0.0040 µg/L | 1/6 | 2025 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 88.82 µg/L 111% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 118 µg/L | 65/65 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 34 µg/L 57% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 52 µg/L | 65/65 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 12.54 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.6 µg/L | 59/59 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 56.59 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 76.6 µg/L | 59/59 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 17.1 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23 µg/L | 59/59 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 13.1 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21 µg/L | 59/59 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 4.02 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.54 µg/L | 56/59 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 7.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 30/59 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.69 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.9 µg/L | 24/59 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0010 mg/L 6.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 21/21 | LCR | 2023 |
| Copper | 196.65 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 399 µg/L | 20/20 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 8.44 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.4 µg/L | 17/59 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 17.635 µg/L 118% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 33.2 µg/L | 12/20 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Bromoform | 0.2395 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.2500 µg/L | 4/59 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
29 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about North Tiverton Fire District
Is North Tiverton Fire District tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in North Tiverton Fire District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in North Tiverton Fire District's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does North Tiverton Fire District serve?
North Tiverton Fire District reports serving 8,969 people in Rhode Island, per its EPA record.
Has North Tiverton Fire District had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 19 violations on file for North Tiverton Fire District, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.