← Pennsylvania

Tap water quality report

Ephrata Area Joint Authority

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 110 contaminants and detected 28. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

110
contaminants tested
28
detected
24,500
people served
9
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Lancaster

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

9
health-based violations
175
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2013-04-01 → 2013-06-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2013-04-01 → 2013-06-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2013-04-01 → 2013-06-30
TT Health-based Resolved 1994-01-01 → 1994-01-31
TT Health-based Resolved 1994-01-01 → 1994-01-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-07-01 → 1993-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-07-01 → 1993-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 1993-04-01 → 1993-04-30
TT Health-based Resolved 1993-04-01 → 1993-04-30
Other Monitoring Resolved 2025-10-01

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFBS 0.0063 µg/L 6/8 2025
Pfhxa 0.0059 µg/L 6/8 2025
Pfpea 0.0069 µg/L 6/8 2025
PFOA 0.0058 µg/L 4/8 2025
PFHXS 0.0036 µg/L 1/8 2025
PFOS 0.0046 µg/L 1/8 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
6700 µg/L 67%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 7260 µg/L
128/148 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
65.61 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 92.7 µg/L
115/120 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
13.605 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.2 µg/L
114/119 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
83.285 µg/L 104%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 113 µg/L
112/116 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
5.2965 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.19 µg/L
110/118 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
89.19 µg/L 149%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 115 µg/L
94/118 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
321.25 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 532 µg/L
80/90 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
1.611 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.84 µg/L
50/116 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
28.95 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 44 µg/L
42/51 SYR4 2017–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
26.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 40 µg/L
35/51 SYR4 2017–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
20/51 SYR4 2017–2019
Lead
0.0015 mg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2025
Barium
94.46 µg/L 4.7%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 97.4 µg/L
8/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Tetrachloroethylene
0.9000 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
8/49 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
134.5 µg/L 897%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 177 µg/L
6/93 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
177 µg/L 4.4%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 180 µg/L
3/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
3/49 SYR4 2017–2019
Atrazine
0.6700 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.7000 µg/L
2/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
4.325 µg/L 4.3%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.5 µg/L
2/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
3.01 µg/L 6%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L
2/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
9.45 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/8 UCMR-5 2025
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
0.2000 µg/L 0.4%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
1/18 SYR4 2012–2019
82 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
GAIL BARE, SEC
Phone
717-738-9242

Frequently asked questions about Ephrata Area Joint Authority

Is Ephrata Area Joint Authority tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 28 contaminants in Ephrata Area Joint Authority's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Ephrata Area Joint Authority's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, TTHM, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Ephrata Area Joint Authority serve?

Ephrata Area Joint Authority reports serving 24,500 people in Pennsylvania, per its EPA record.

Has Ephrata Area Joint Authority had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 175 violations on file for Ephrata Area Joint Authority, of which 9 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.