Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-08-01 → 2008-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-08-01 → 2008-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-08-01 → 2008-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-08-01 → 2008-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-08-01 → 2008-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1992-02-01 → 1992-02-29 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-09-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-09-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-09-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-09-01 → 2025-09-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 1782.5 µg/L 137% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1880 µg/L | 60/60 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate | 5567 µg/L 56% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 5900 µg/L | 30/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 2.17 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L | 27/60 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 2.713 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.28 µg/L | 15/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 4.957 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.79 µg/L | 15/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 9.6245 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 11.1 µg/L | 14/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.052 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.07 µg/L | 13/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 2.82 µg/L 4.7% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 3 µg/L | 7/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0679 mg/L 453% above the EPA limit of 0.0150 mg/L | 3/3 | LCR | 1997 |
| Barium | 10.905 µg/L 0.5% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 11 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2012–2013 |
| Dichloromethane | 0.6000 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L | 1/9 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Xylenes, Total | 2.9 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/9 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
66 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Gratz Boro Water Revenue Fund
Is Gratz Boro Water Revenue Fund tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Gratz Boro Water Revenue Fund's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Gratz Boro Water Revenue Fund's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Gratz Boro Water Revenue Fund serve?
Gratz Boro Water Revenue Fund reports serving 738 people in Pennsylvania, per its EPA record.
Has Gratz Boro Water Revenue Fund had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 375 violations on file for Gratz Boro Water Revenue Fund, of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.