Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2012-04-01 → 2012-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2012-04-01 → 2012-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2012-01-01 → 2012-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2012-01-01 → 2012-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2011-10-01 → 2011-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2011-10-01 → 2011-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2011-10-01 → 2011-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2011-10-01 → 2011-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2011-10-01 → 2011-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2011-10-01 → 2011-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 18.6 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22.8 µg/L | 129/129 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 34.6 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 47.5 µg/L | 129/129 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 11 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.5 µg/L | 129/129 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 57.84 µg/L 72% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 81.7 µg/L | 129/129 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 44.685 µg/L 74% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 56.3 µg/L | 128/129 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 50.6 µg/L 3.9% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 142 µg/L | 115/121 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 39/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 27.18 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 31.9 µg/L | 29/29 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 19.9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22.6 µg/L | 29/29 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2025 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 4.192 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.54 µg/L | 9/29 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Fluoride | 1335.35 µg/L 33% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1580 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 52.8 µg/L 2.6% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 54 µg/L | 7/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 836 µg/L 8.4% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 4/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 5.342 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.67 µg/L | 3/28 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Lead | 229.25 µg/L 1528% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 240 µg/L | 2/91 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Antimony, Total | 0.5000 µg/L 8.3% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Cyanide | 6 µg/L 3% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dalapon | 1.37 µg/L 0.7% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 1/9 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
91 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about New Kensington Muni Auth
Is New Kensington Muni Auth tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in New Kensington Muni Auth's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in New Kensington Muni Auth's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does New Kensington Muni Auth serve?
New Kensington Muni Auth reports serving 47,800 people in Pennsylvania, per its EPA record.
Has New Kensington Muni Auth had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 43 violations on file for New Kensington Muni Auth, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.