← Pennsylvania

Tap water quality report

Mawc Furnace Run

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 11. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
11
detected
3,100
people served
16
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Westmoreland

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

16
health-based violations
221
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2006-07-01 → 2006-07-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2006-07-01 → 2006-07-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2006-07-01 → 2006-07-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2006-07-01 → 2006-07-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2006-07-01 → 2006-07-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2004-01-01 → 2004-03-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2000-09-01 → 2000-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2000-09-01 → 2000-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2000-09-01 → 2000-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2000-09-01 → 2000-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Chloroform
60 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 82 µg/L
59/59 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
66.06 µg/L 83%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 89 µg/L
59/59 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
65.28 µg/L 109%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 70 µg/L
59/61 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
6.17 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.28 µg/L
57/59 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
784.1 µg/L 60%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 973 µg/L
43/43 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
25.395 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26.5 µg/L
14/14 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
39.34 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 39.6 µg/L
14/14 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2 µg/L
11/59 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.539 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.77 µg/L
7/14 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0070 mg/L 47%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
3/3 LCR 1996
Lead
120 µg/L 800%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
1/33 SYR4 2013–2019
3 contaminants tested, none detected
BromoformDibromoacetic AcidMonobromoacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
JOHN ASHTON
Phone
724-755-5800

Frequently asked questions about Mawc Furnace Run

Is Mawc Furnace Run tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 11 contaminants in Mawc Furnace Run's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Mawc Furnace Run's water?

EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Copper, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Mawc Furnace Run serve?

Mawc Furnace Run reports serving 3,100 people in Pennsylvania, per its EPA record.

Has Mawc Furnace Run had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 221 violations on file for Mawc Furnace Run, of which 16 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.