Is Icmsa Lucerne Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: SWP
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Indiana

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2008-07-01 → 2008-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2008-07-01 → 2008-09-30
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2016-10-01 → 2016-12-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2016-10-01 → 2016-12-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2015-04-01 → 2015-06-30
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2015-04-01 → 2015-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Copper	75.2 µg/L 5.8% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 189 µg/L	39/40	SYR4	2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane	14.7225 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 15 µg/L	22/22	SYR4	2012–2019
Chloroform	52.785 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 68.1 µg/L	22/22	SYR4	2012–2019
TTHM	70.652 µg/L 88% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 85 µg/L	22/22	SYR4	2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	26.855 µg/L 45% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 36.9 µg/L	22/22	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane	3.11 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 3.38 µg/L	21/22	SYR4	2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	11.985 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 12 µg/L	4/4	SYR4	2015–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	14.385 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 15 µg/L	3/4	SYR4	2015–2019
Lead	0.0030 mg/L 20% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	2/2	LCR	1996
Lead	8.11 µg/L 54% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L	1/30	SYR4	2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid	1.07 µg/L No EPA limit set	1/4	SYR4	2015–2019

3 contaminants tested, none detected

BromoformDibromoacetic AcidMonobromoacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact: MARTIN MASCHAK
Phone: 724-349-6640

Frequently asked questions about Icmsa Lucerne

Is Icmsa Lucerne tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 11 contaminants in Icmsa Lucerne's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Icmsa Lucerne's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Icmsa Lucerne serve?

Icmsa Lucerne reports serving 625 people in Pennsylvania, per its EPA record.

Has Icmsa Lucerne had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 62 violations on file for Icmsa Lucerne, of which 2 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.