Tap WaterIndex

← North Carolina

Tap water quality report

Rolling Valley Estates

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 80 contaminants and detected 16. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

80
contaminants tested
16
detected
180
people served
0
health-based violations
North Carolina rankingsLead in North CarolinaPFAS in North Carolina
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Butler

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
259
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MON Monitoring Archived 2026-04-01 → 2026-04-30
MON Monitoring Archived 2026-04-01 → 2026-04-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-07-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-07-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-07-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-07-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-11-01 → 2023-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-11-01 → 2023-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-11-01 → 2023-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-11-01 → 2023-11-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
91.3 µg/L 7%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 116 µg/L
14/15 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 5/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Bromodichloromethane
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 4/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
615.3 µg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 634 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Bromoform
0.7520 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.7800 µg/L
3/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0120 mg/L 80%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 3/3 LCR 1996
Lead
4.604 µg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.9 µg/L
3/15 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
2.76 µg/L 3.5%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L
3/4 SYR4 2012–2018
Chloroform
0.6000 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 2/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Fluoride
240.9 µg/L 6%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 243 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Nitrate
130 µg/L 1.3%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 2/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
0.7500 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/1 SYR4 2018
Dichloroacetic Acid
0.5400 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/1 SYR4 2018
Monochloroacetic Acid
1.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/1 SYR4 2018
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
3.8 µg/L 6.3%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
 1/4 SYR4 2012–2018
Trichloroacetic Acid
0.6500 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/1 SYR4 2018
64 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
KELLEN BUSS
Phone
419-357-9091

Frequently asked questions about Rolling Valley Estates

Is Rolling Valley Estates tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Rolling Valley Estates's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Rolling Valley Estates's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Dibromochloromethane, Bromodichloromethane, Barium, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Rolling Valley Estates serve?

Rolling Valley Estates reports serving 180 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Rolling Valley Estates had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 259 violations on file for Rolling Valley Estates, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.