← Pennsylvania

Tap water quality report

Kittanning Suburb Jt Water Aut

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 108 contaminants and detected 17. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

108
contaminants tested
17
detected
8,000
people served
20
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Armstrong

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

20
health-based violations
298
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-07-01 → 2009-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
260 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 389 µg/L
58/62 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
63.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 74 µg/L
57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
61.4 µg/L 102%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 87 µg/L
57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
26.25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32 µg/L
56/57 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
98.375 µg/L 123%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 104 µg/L
56/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
13.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23 µg/L
55/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
3.125 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4 µg/L
36/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
530 µg/L 5.3%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.00067 mg/L 4.5%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2025
Dichloroacetic Acid
29.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 33.8 µg/L
11/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
20.845 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21.7 µg/L
10/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.448 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.48 µg/L
9/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
688.5 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 720 µg/L
8/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
888.2 µg/L 44%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 980 µg/L
3/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
304.335 µg/L 2029%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 320 µg/L
2/62 SYR4 2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.4085 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.42 µg/L
2/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.02 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/11 SYR4 2012–2019
91 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
RON RIESMEYER
Phone
724-545-6395

Frequently asked questions about Kittanning Suburb Jt Water Aut

Is Kittanning Suburb Jt Water Aut tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Kittanning Suburb Jt Water Aut's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Kittanning Suburb Jt Water Aut's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Chloroform, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Kittanning Suburb Jt Water Aut serve?

Kittanning Suburb Jt Water Aut reports serving 8,000 people in Pennsylvania, per its EPA record.

Has Kittanning Suburb Jt Water Aut had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 298 violations on file for Kittanning Suburb Jt Water Aut, of which 20 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.