Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-11-01 → 2022-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-11-01 → 2022-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-11-01 → 2022-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-11-01 → 2022-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-11-01 → 2022-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-11-01 → 2022-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-10-01 → 2022-10-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-10-01 → 2022-10-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-10-01 → 2022-10-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-10-01 → 2022-10-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 20.965 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23.6 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 49.235 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 66 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 13.065 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 76.495 µg/L 96% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 95 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 49.77 µg/L 83% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 63 µg/L | 127/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 100 µg/L 7.7% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 470 µg/L | 88/95 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.32 µg/L | 44/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 14.585 µg/L 97% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 62 µg/L | 22/95 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 24.245 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25.1 µg/L | 20/20 | SYR4 | 2018–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 27.605 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27.7 µg/L | 20/20 | SYR4 | 2018–2019 |
| Nitrate | 790 µg/L 7.9% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.00046 mg/L 3.1% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 12/12 | LCR | 2025 |
| Fluoride | 676.5 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 680 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 3.256 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.3 µg/L | 3/20 | SYR4 | 2018–2019 |
| Antimony, Total | 9.09 µg/L 152% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 6 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.2 µg/L | 2/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 37.23 µg/L 1.9% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 37.4 µg/L | 2/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 11 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/4 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
92 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Oakmont Water Authority
Is Oakmont Water Authority tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Oakmont Water Authority's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Oakmont Water Authority's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Oakmont Water Authority serve?
Oakmont Water Authority reports serving 39,901 people in Pennsylvania, per its EPA record.
Has Oakmont Water Authority had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 21 violations on file for Oakmont Water Authority, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.